The Boy in the Striped Pajamas (which I will shorten to BSP) is a book written by John Boyne, and published in 2006. Since its release it has sold over 11 million copies worldwide and has been adapted into a movie. However, despite its apparent popularity many have taken issue with this book. I agree with most of their sentiments. I believe BSP is quite possibly one of the worst works of historical fiction ever written. Why? My reasons are that it spreads misinformation about the Holocaust, it misplaces sympathy, and the perspective from which it is written devalues the theme and purpose of the novel.
First, I’d like to address the misinformation and historical inaccuracies. The novel makes it appear as though the average person living in Hitler’s Germany was unaware of what was going on with the Jews. From my research, this is not the case. For those who lived in the eastern part of the country near the concentration camps it was a public secret. If I recall correctly BSP only mentions Jews in relation to the Holocaust. This once again, is not the case. Of the 11 million killed in the Holocaust 5 million were not Jewish. These “others” as they are often referred to as (if they are even mentioned at all) include; Roma, Sinti, black people, Poles, other Slavic peoples, disabled people, political enemies of the Nazi, and even Jehovah’s Witnesses. Oh! To top it all off, Shmuel would most likely have been dead, as he and other children would have probably been gassed on arrival.
Secondly, BSP could potentially lead to dangerously misplaced sympathy. The target audience of the novel is mainly children, who are prone to strong emotional connections. The main character, Bruno, is the son of the commandant of Auschwitz. At the end of the story he (spoiler alert!) dies. We hear how heart wrenching this was for the family, especially for his father. This is dangerous. If children don’t realize this tale is fictional, it could lead to them feeling bad for the Nazi, because “Oh, they were brainwashed into doing what they did”. No, they were not. If anyone deserves sympathy for the crimes against humanity committed during the Holocaust, it’s the people who lived through them and their families, not the Nazi elite.
Lastly, I feel the story loses much of its purpose and theme due to its poor perspective choice. The author has stated that he wanted to inspire people to do their own research into the Holocaust. However, I think you’ll find that a story about a German boy is not the best way to do that. It would be far more effective at portraying its theme of family first and fulfilling its purpose if it was written from the perspective of a person who was separated from their family because of the Holocaust. A good way to encourage research would be to have that person be a Roma or Polish Christian.
This is why I dislike The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. My reasons are that it has many historical inaccuracies, it could potentially lead to misplaced sympathy, and it is written from a perspective that devalues the story. My biggest encouragement to you is to make sure the historical part of historical fiction is in fact historical before teaching it as such.